Brominated flame-retardant composition in firefighter bunker gear and its thermal performance analysis
Journal of Fire Sciences Pub Date: 2021-04-15 DOI: 10.1177/07349041211001296
Abstract
Firefighting bunker gear is manufactured from flame-retardant materials, which resist ignition and delay flame spread. However, concerns have been emerging on the potential harmful effects of some flame retardants (FRs) commonly used in flame-retarding materials, particularly the brominated flame retardants. This study investigated the presence of flame retardants in bunker gear, particularly polybrominated diphenyl ethers and their congeners in the garments, and evaluated their impact on thermal performance. X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy was used to ascertain the presence of bromine as a possible indicator for brominated flame retardants. X-ray fluorescence results indicated the presence of Br in all samples, ranging from 444 to 20,367 μg/g. Further analysis via gas chromatography–mass spectrometry was done on samples. Brominated flame retardants, particularly polybrominated diphenyl ethers and hexabromocyclododecane, were detected in all samples with concentrations ranging from 261.61 to 1001.77 μg/g and 0.01 to 0.07 μg/g, respectively. The cone calorimeter was used, with 50 and 75?kW/m2 heat fluxes, to investigate the impact of the brominated flame-retardant concentrations, if any, on thermal performance. New bunker garments, particularly those with lower Br and brominated flame-retardant concentrations, were observed to have higher thermal performance.Recommended Literature
- [1] Enabling non-flammable Li-metal batteries via electrolyte functionalization and interface engineering? Jing Yu,Yu-Qi Lyu,Jiapeng Liu,Mohammed B. Effat,Junxiong WuJ. Mater. Chem. A, 2019,7, 17995-18002 10.1039/C9TA03784E
- [2] Emerging investigators Polym. Chem., 2015,6, 5501-5502 10.1039/C5PY90111A
- [3] Estimation of activation energy for electroporation and pore growth rate in liquid crystalline and gel phases of lipid bilayers using molecular dynamics simulations? Amit Kumar Majhi,Subbarao Kanchi,V. Venkataraman,K. G. Ayappa,Prabal K. MaitiSoft Matter, 2015,11, 8632-8640 10.1039/C5SM02029H
- [4] Excited-state proton-coupled electron transfer within ion pairs? Gerald J. Meyer,Leif Hammarstr?mChem. Sci., 2020,11, 3460-3473 10.1039/C9SC04941J
- [5] Fe/Fe3C@C nanoparticles encapsulated in N-doped graphene–CNTs framework as an efficient bifunctional oxygen electrocatalyst for robust rechargeable Zn–air batteries? Zhiyan Chen,Nan Wu,Yaobing Wang,Bing Wang,Yingde WangJ. Mater. Chem. A, 2018,6, 516-526 10.1039/C7TA08423D
- [6] Evolved polymerases facilitate selection of fully 2′-OMe-modified aptamers? Zhixia Liu,Tingjian Chen,Floyd E. RomesbergChem. Sci., 2017,8, 8179-8182 10.1039/C7SC03747C
- [7] Fe3O4 nanoparticle chains with N-doped carbon coating: magnetotactic bacteria assisted synthesis and high-rate lithium storage? Dan Yang,Yanping Zhou,Xianhong Rui,Jixin Zhu,Ziyang Lu,Eileen Fong,Qingyu YanRSC Adv., 2013,3, 14960-14962 10.1039/C3RA42116C
- [8] Fe3O4 nanoclusters highly dispersed on a porous graphene support as an additive for improving the hydrogen storage properties of LiBH4? Guang Xu,Wei Zhang,Ying Zhang,Xiaoxia Zhao,Ping Wen,Di MaRSC Adv., 2018,8, 19353-19361 10.1039/C8RA02762E
- [9] Evidence of pre-micellar aggregates in aqueous solution of amphiphilic PDMS–PEO block copolymer? Domenico Lombardo,Gianmarco Munaò,Pietro Calandra,Luigi Pasqua,Maria Teresa CaccamoPhys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019,21, 11983-11991 10.1039/C9CP02195G
- [10] Excimer–monomer switch: a reaction-based approach for selective detection of fluoride? Qiao Song,Angela Bamesberger,Lingyun Yang,Haley Houtwed,Haishi CaoAnalyst, 2014,139, 3588-3592 10.1039/C4AN00522H
Journal Name:Journal of Fire Sciences
research_products
-
CAS no.: 89640-58-4