Metal–organic frameworks: a future toolbox for biomedicine?
Chemical Society Reviews Pub Date: 2020-11-02 DOI: 10.1039/D0CS00883D
Abstract
The present review focuses on the use of Metal–Organic Frameworks, (MOFs) highlighting the most recent developments in the biological field. This review assesses, in the first instance, the cytotoxicity of MOFs (particularly those used for various biological applications described throughout this review), and shows that for standard MOFs based on metals already present in active molecules of the human body, toxicity is not a significant limitation. Here we underline the MIL-, UiO- and ZIF-series of MOFs which remain until now the most used materials in drug delivery of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), such as antitumourals or retroviral drugs (with high loading and slow release time). Porosity remains undoubtedly the most studied key property of MOFs, that allows the protection of active biomolecules such as enzymes or the development of antimicrobial materials. Emphasis is given on the usage of MOFs for the detection of biomarkers in biological fluids such as urine and blood (detection of cystinuria, identification of penicillin anaphylaxis, urea, bilirubin, biomarkers related to human intoxication, tumoural indicators, among several others), for which a number of simple devices (such as paper strips) were developed. Despite the remarkable and promising results presented in recent years, the literature remains scarce (mostly non-existent) in terms of direct comparison of these novel technologies with the solutions presently available in the market. Action on this side may make the difference in the next years concerning research on MOFs, to see if some of these materials may reach the end-user as new and more efficient treatments or detection approaches.
Recommended Literature
- [1] Examination of ammonia–poly(pyrrole) interactions by piezoelectric and conductivity measurements Analyst, 1991,116, 1125-1130 10.1039/AN9911601125
- [2] Evidence of CO2 molecule acting as an electron acceptor on a nanoporous metal–organic-framework MIL-53 or Cr3+(OH)(O2C–C6H4–CO2)? Alexandre Vimont,Arnaud Travert,Philippe Bazin,Jean-Claude Lavalley,Marco Daturi,Christian Serre,Gérard Férey,Sandrine Bourrelly,Philip L. LlewellynChem. Commun., 2007, 3291-3293 10.1039/B703468G
- [3] Evolution of important glucosinolates in three common Brassica vegetables during their processing into vegetable powder and in vitro gastric digestion Nan Fu,Naphaporn Chiewchan,Xiao Dong ChenFood Funct., 2020,11, 211-220 10.1039/C9FO00811J
- [4] Emerging investigator series: heterogeneous reactions of sulfur dioxide on mineral dust nanoparticles: from single component to mixed components? Tao Wang,Yangyang Liu,Yue Deng,Hongbo Fu,Jianmin ChenEnviron. Sci.: Nano, 2018,5, 1821-1833 10.1039/C8EN00376A
- [5] Dissociative electron attachment to HGaF4 Lewis–Br?nsted superacid Marcin Czapla,Jack SimonsPhys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018,20, 21739-21745 10.1039/C8CP04007A
- [6] Examination of deposit in commercial diluted phosphoric acid Analyst, 1880,5, 146-147 10.1039/AN8800500146
- [7] Dissolved oxygen sensor based on fluorescence quenching of oxygen-sensitive ruthenium complexes immobilized in sol–gel-derived porous silica coatings Analyst, 1996,121, 785-788 10.1039/AN9962100785
- [8] Enabling non-flammable Li-metal batteries via electrolyte functionalization and interface engineering? Jing Yu,Yu-Qi Lyu,Jiapeng Liu,Mohammed B. Effat,Junxiong WuJ. Mater. Chem. A, 2019,7, 17995-18002 10.1039/C9TA03784E
- [9] Dissolution of cork biopolymers in biocompatible ionic liquids Helga Garcia,Rui Ferreira,Marija Petkovic,Jamie L. Ferguson,Maria C. Leit?o,H. Q. Nimal Gunaratne,Luís Paulo N. RebeloGreen Chem., 2010,12, 367-369 10.1039/B922553F
- [10] Fe(iii)-mediated isomerization of α,α-diarylallylic alcohols to ketones via radical 1,2-aryl migration? Ziyang Deng,Changwei Chen,Sunliang CuiRSC Adv., 2016,6, 93753-93755 10.1039/C6RA20007A
Journal Name:Chemical Society Reviews
research_products
-
CAS no.: 89640-58-4