A structural bioinformatics investigation on protein-DNA complexes delineates their modes of interaction.
Molecular BioSystems Pub Date: 2017-04-19 DOI: 10.1039/c7mb00071e
Abstract
The lifetimes of protein-DNA adducts are strictly related to the various protein functions. This feature must be encoded by the amino acids located at the protein-DNA interface. The large number of structurally characterized protein-DNA complexes now available from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) allows extensive structural bioinformatics investigations on protein-DNA interfaces. The modes of protein binding to DNA have been explored by dividing 629 non-redundant PDB files of protein-DNA complexes into separate classes for structural proteins, transcription factors and DNA-related enzymes. From the selected PDB structures, we could define 2953 protein-DNA contact regions. A systematic analysis of amino acid occurrences at these protein-DNA contact regions yielded composition profiles, which are typical for each of the three protein classes. The critical role of some amino acids to influence intermolecular contact lifetimes is discussed here. The occurrence of arginine at the protein-DNA interface, by far the most abundant amino acid in this protein moiety, is found to be the main feature that differentiates proteins from the three classes. Structural proteins and, to a lesser extent, transcription factors exhibit the highest Arg occurrence at protein-DNA contact regions. Reduced Arg/Lys ratios together with increased contents of Asp and Glu are observed in all the DNA-interacting enzymes. The amount of negatively charged side chains, highly conserved among homologous DNA-related enzymes at protein-DNA interfaces, is suggested as a tool to modulate protein mobility along DNA chains. Arg/Lys, Asp/Asn and Glu/Gln substitutions at protein-DNA interfaces may represent a very feasible way to control protein motion on DNA rails.Recommended Literature
- [1] An integrated system for field analysis of Cd(ii) and Pb(ii) via preconcentration using nano-TiO2/cellulose paper composite and subsequent detection with a portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer? Xiaofeng LinRSC Adv., 2016,6, 9002-9006 10.1039/C5RA25693C
- [2] An artificial photosynthetic system for photoaccumulation of two electrons on a fused dipyridophenazine (dppz)–pyridoquinolinone ligand? Philipp Traber,Stephan Kupfer,Stefanie Gr?fe,Isabelle Baussanne,Martine Demeunynck,Jean-Marie Mouesca,Serge Gambarelli,Vincent Artero,Murielle Chavarot-KerlidouChem. Sci., 2018,9, 4152-4159 10.1039/C7SC04348A
- [3] Alt-proteins: A promising future 10.1002/fsat.3701_10.x
- [4] Alternative donor substrates for inverting and retaining glycosyltransferases? Luke L. Lairson,Warren W. WakarchukChem. Commun., 2007, 365-367 10.1039/B614636H
- [5] An apparatus for testing water by measurement of its electrical conductivity Analyst, 1912,37, 538-543 10.1039/AN9123700538
- [6] An aptamer-based keypad lock system? Yaqing Liu,Jiangtao Ren,Jing Li,Jiyang Liu,Erkang WangChem. Commun., 2012,48, 802-804 10.1039/C1CC15979H
- [7] Acetyl group orientation modulates the electronic ground-state asymmetry of the special pair in purple bacterial reaction centers P. K. Wawrzyniak,M. T. P. Beerepoot,H. J. M. de Groot,F. BudaPhys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011,13, 10270-10279 10.1039/C1CP20213H
- [8] Alternative synthesis of the anti-baldness compound RU58841? RSC Adv., 2014,4, 14143-14148 10.1039/C4RA00332B
- [9] Aggregation of biologically important peptides and proteins: inhibition or acceleration depending on protein and metal ion concentrations Benjamin Gabriel Poulson,Kacper Szczepski,Joanna Izabela Lachowicz,Lukasz Jaremko,Abdul-Hamid Emwas,Mariusz JaremkoRSC Adv., 2020,10, 215-227 10.1039/C9RA09350H
- [10] An integrated digital microfluidic chip for multiplexed proteomic sample preparation and analysis by MALDI-MS? Hyejin Moon,Aaron R. Wheeler,Robin L. Garrell,Chang-Jin “CJ” KimLab Chip, 2006,6, 1213-1219 10.1039/B601954D
Journal Name:Molecular BioSystems
research_products
-
CAS no.: 89640-58-4