Quantitative analysis of iontophoretic drug delivery from micropipettes
Analyst Pub Date: 2016-02-15 DOI: 10.1039/C5AN02530C
Abstract
Microiontophoresis is a drug delivery method in which an electric current is used to eject molecular species from a micropipette. It has been primarily utilized for neurochemical investigations, but is limited due to difficulty controlling and determining the ejected quantity. Consequently the concentration of an ejected species and the extent of the affected region are relegated to various methods of approximation. To address this, we investigated the principles underlying ejection rates and examined the concentration distribution in microiontophoresis using a combination of electrochemical, chromatographic, and fluorescence-based approaches. This involved a principal focus on how the iontophoretic barrel solution affects ejection characteristics. The ion ejection rate displayed a direct correspondence to the ionic mole fraction, regardless of the ejection current polarity. In contrast, neutral molecules are ejected by electroosmotic flow (EOF) at a rate proportional to the barrel solution concentration. Furthermore, the presence of EOF was observed from barrels containing high ionic strength solutions. In practice, use of a retaining current draws extracellular ions into the barrel and will alter the barrel solution composition. Even in the absence of a retaining current, diffusional exchange at the barrel tip will occur. Thus behavior of successive ejections may slightly differ. To account for this, electrochemical or fluorescence markers can be incorporated into the barrel solution in order to compare ejection quantities. These may also be used to provide an estimate of the ejected amount and distribution provided accurate use of calibration procedures.
Recommended Literature
- [1] Distinction of trans–cis photoisomers with comparable optical properties in multiple-state photochromic systems – examining a molecule with three azobenzenes via in situ irradiation NMR spectroscopy? Jonas Kind,Lukas Kaltschnee,Martin Leyendecker,Christina M. ThieleChem. Commun., 2016,52, 12506-12509 10.1039/C6CC06771A
- [2] Enantiomeric helical TiO2 nanofibers modulate different peptide assemblies and subsequent cellular behaviors? Xu Jie,Deng Xu,Weili WeiRSC Adv., 2019,9, 29149-29153 10.1039/C9RA04660G
- [3] Emulsion technologies for multicellular tumour spheroid radiation assays? Kay S. McMillan,Anthony G. McCluskey,Annette Sorensen,Marie Boyd,Michele ZagnoniAnalyst, 2016,141, 100-110 10.1039/C5AN01382H
- [4] Evidence of rutile-to-anatase photo-induced electron transfer in mixed-phase TiO2 by solid-state NMR spectroscopy? Weili Dai,Guangjun Wu,Michael HungerChem. Commun., 2015,51, 13779-13782 10.1039/C5CC04971G
- [5] Exceptional activity of sub-nm Pt clusters on CdS for photocatalytic hydrogen production: a combined experimental and first-principles study? Qiyuan Wu,Shangmin Xiong,Peichuan Shen,Shen Zhao,Alexander OrlovCatal. Sci. Technol., 2015,5, 2059-2064 10.1039/C4CY01563K
- [6] Fe/S-Catalyzed synthesis of 2-benzoylbenzoxazoles and 2-quinolylbenzoxazoles via redox condensation of o-nitrophenols with acetophenones and methylquinolines? Thi Thu Tram Nguyen,Thanh Binh NguyenOrg. Biomol. Chem., 2021,19, 6015-6020 10.1039/D1OB00976A
- [7] Dissociative electron attachment to HGaF4 Lewis–Br?nsted superacid Marcin Czapla,Jack SimonsPhys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018,20, 21739-21745 10.1039/C8CP04007A
- [8] Establishment and implications of a characterization method for magnetic nanoparticle using cell tracking velocimetry and magnetic susceptibility modified solutions Huading Zhang,Lee R. Moore,Maciej Zborowski,P. Stephen Williams,Shlomo Margel,Jeffrey J. ChalmersAnalyst, 2005,130, 514-527 10.1039/B412723D
- [9] Exciting clusters, what does off-resonance actually mean?? Goonay Yousefalizadeh,Shideh Ahmadi,Nicholas J. Mosey,Kevin G. StamplecoskieNanoscale, 2021,13, 242-252 10.1039/D0NR06493A
- [10] Enantio- & chemo-selective preparation of enantiomerically enriched aliphatic nitro alcohols using Candida parapsilosis ATCC 7330 Sowmyalakshmi VenkataramanRSC Adv., 2015,5, 73807-73813 10.1039/C5RA13593A
Journal Name:Analyst
research_products
-
CAS no.: 89640-58-4