Does the Seebeck coefficient of a single-molecule junction depend on the junction configuration??
Journal of Materials Chemistry A Pub Date: 2021-07-28 DOI: 10.1039/D1TA05324H
Abstract
A new experimental method for the simultaneous determination of the electric and thermoelectric properties of metal–molecule–metal junctions at the single-molecule level has been developed to test the effects of the junction configuration on the thermopower properties. The method is based on dynamic switching between (thermo)electric current and thermoelectric voltage measurements. Two model systems, 4,4′-bipyridine (1) and 4,4′-diaminostilbene (2), have been scrutinized. Single-molecule conductance (G) and thermopower (S) values were obtained for the two most probable junction configurations of 1 and 2, each having two different conductance values, GH (high) and GL (low), where GH > GL. Thermopower values of S(GH) = ?6.4 ± 1.5 μV K?1 and S(GL) = ?7.0 ± 1.6 μV K?1 were obtained for the molecular junctions of 1 and values of S(GH) = +14.4 ± 3.5 μV K?1 and S(GL) = +10.4 ± 3.0 μV K?1 were obtained for the molecular junctions of 2. The GH and S(GH) values for 1 and 2 are consistent with previously reported results. Thermopower values obtained simultaneously with conductance measurements for both configurations of 2 during junction evolution are reported for the first time. This work shows that, within experimental error, both S values are the same for each molecule, i.e., S(GH) ≈ S(GL), and they do not depend on the molecular junction configuration. This is an important finding, which supports claims that thermopower is an intensive property of matter. DFT calculations of transmission functions combined with a non-equilibrium Green's function approach complete this study.
Recommended Literature
- [1] Excitable dynamics in the bromate–sulfite–ferrocyanide reaction J. Zagora,M. Vosla?,L. Schreiberová,I. SchreiberPhys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2002,4, 1284-1291 10.1039/B110048C
- [2] Enabling high-throughput single-animal gene-expression studies with molecular and micro-scale technologies Jason WanLab Chip, 2020,20, 4528-4538 10.1039/D0LC00881H
- [3] Fate of single walled carbon nanotubes in wetland ecosystems? Joseph H. Bisesi,Tara Sabo-AttwoodEnviron. Sci.: Nano, 2014,1, 574-583 10.1039/C4EN00063C
- [4] Establishing new scaling relations on two-dimensional MXenes for CO2 electroreduction? Albertus D. Handoko,Khoong Hong Khoo,Teck Leong Tan,Hongmei Jin,Zhi Wei SehJ. Mater. Chem. A, 2018,6, 21885-21890 10.1039/C8TA06567E
- [5] Dissociative electron attachment to HGaF4 Lewis–Br?nsted superacid Marcin Czapla,Jack SimonsPhys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018,20, 21739-21745 10.1039/C8CP04007A
- [6] Emulsifier-free, organotellurium-mediated living radical emulsion polymerization (emulsion TERP) of styrene: poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) macro-TERP agent? Yukiya KitayamaPolym. Chem., 2014,5, 2784-2792 10.1039/C3PY01539D
- [7] Emulsion technologies for multicellular tumour spheroid radiation assays? Kay S. McMillan,Anthony G. McCluskey,Annette Sorensen,Marie Boyd,Michele ZagnoniAnalyst, 2016,141, 100-110 10.1039/C5AN01382H
- [8] Exchangeability of amino acid residues with similar physicochemical properties in coiled-coil interactions? Guiying Zhang,Maosheng Cheng,Yanni Li,Keliang Liu,Lifeng CaiChem. Commun., 2013,49, 11086-11088 10.1039/C3CC46560H
- [9] Emulsion soft templating of carbide-derived carbon nanospheres with controllable porosity for capacitive electrochemical energy storage? M. Zeiger,N. J?ckel,P. Strubel,L. Borchardt,R. Reinhold,W. Nickel,J. Eckert,V. Presser,S. KaskelJ. Mater. Chem. A, 2015,3, 17983-17990 10.1039/C5TA03730A
- [10] Evolution in surface coverage of CH3NH3PbI3?XClXvia heat assisted solvent vapour treatment and their effects on photovoltaic performance of devices Dhirendra K. Chaudhary,Pramendra Kumar,Lokendra KumarRSC Adv., 2016,6, 94731-94738 10.1039/C6RA18729C
Journal Name:Journal of Materials Chemistry A
research_products
-
CAS no.: 89640-58-4