Selenium speciation by high-performance liquid chromatography–fraction collection–electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry: optimization of critical parameters
Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry Pub Date: DOI: 10.1039/JA9930800643
Abstract
Chromatographic effluents were analysed by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (ETAAS) using a sampling procedure based on fraction collection and hot injection onto a graphite furnace. In order to reduce analyte dilution and to attain the maximum sensitivity of the combined system, special attention was paid to the volume of fraction collected and the volume of each fraction injected onto the furnace. Total volumes of 60 μl (50 μl of sample + 10 μl of modifier) were introduced into the graphite furnace by hot injection, using a pre-heating temperature of 120 °C and an injection rate of 3.3 μl s–1. Under these conditions, the detection limit for determination of selenium was 1.21 μg l–1 and the repeatability 2.4% for 40 μg l–1. When effluent fractions were analysed with the hot injection programme, the use of fraction volumes of 0.50 ml or lower provided a detection limit below 1 ng of selenium with respect to the sample injected into the chromatograph. This procedure was applied to the speciation of selenium. The separation of trimethylselenonium, selenite and selenate was performed by anion-exchange chromatography using 0.01 mol l–1 ammonium citrate at pH 3.0 and 7.0 as eluent. The presence of such a concentration of citrate produced a negative interference on selenium determination and this signal suppression was reduced by 17% on increasing the amount of nickel (200 μg) and also adding magnesium nitrate (50 μg) and overcome by using matrix-matched standards. Detection limits were 1.67, 1.27 and 0.76 ng of Se for trimethylselenonium, selenite and selenate, respectively.
Recommended Literature
- [1] Excess electrons in lithium–ethylamine solutions—density, electrical conductivity and EPR studies Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 1999,1, 3561-3565 10.1039/A900683D
- [2] Esterase-responsive polymeric prodrug-based tumor targeting nanoparticles for improved anti-tumor performance against colon cancer? Gang Pan,Yi-jie Bao,Jie Xu,Tao Liu,Cheng Liu,Yan-yan Qiu,Xiao-jing Shi,Hui Yu,Ting-ting Jia,Xia Yuan,Ze-ting Yuan,Yi-jun CaoRSC Adv., 2016,6, 42109-42119 10.1039/C6RA05236C
- [3] Fe(iii)-mediated isomerization of α,α-diarylallylic alcohols to ketones via radical 1,2-aryl migration? Ziyang Deng,Changwei Chen,Sunliang CuiRSC Adv., 2016,6, 93753-93755 10.1039/C6RA20007A
- [4] Emerging investigator series: bacteriophages as nano engineering tools for quality monitoring and pathogen detection in water and wastewater Fereshteh BayatEnviron. Sci.: Nano, 2021,8, 367-389 10.1039/D0EN00962H
- [5] Fe(ii)-Assisted one-pot synthesis of ultra-small core–shell Au–Pt nanoparticles as superior catalysts towards the HER and ORR? Yi Cao,Yujiao Xiahou,Lixiang Xing,Xiang Zhang,Hong Li,ChenShou Wu,Haibing XiaNanoscale, 2020,12, 20456-20466 10.1039/D0NR04995F
- [6] Evolution of dealloying induced strain in nanoporous gold crystals? Ross Harder,David C. Dunand,Ian McNultyNanoscale, 2017,9, 5686-5693 10.1039/C6NR09635B
- [7] Fe3O4 nanosphere@microporous organic networks: enhanced anode performances in lithium ion batteries through carbonization? Byungho Lim,Jaewon Jin,Jin Yoo,Seung Yong Han,Kyeongyeol Kim,Sungah Kang,Nojin Park,Sang Moon Lee,Hae Jin Kim,Seung Uk SonChem. Commun., 2014,50, 7723-7726 10.1039/C4CC02068E
- [8] Evidence of field induced slow magnetic relaxation in cis-[Co(hfac)2(H2O)2] exhibiting tri-axial anisotropy with a negative axial component? Denis V. Korchagin,Elena A. Yureva,Alexander V. Akimov,Eugenii Ya. Misochko,Gennady V. Shilov,Artem D. Talantsev,Roman B. Morgunov,Alexander A. Shakin,Sergey M. Aldoshin,Boris S. TsukerblatDalton Trans., 2017,46, 7540-7548 10.1039/C7DT01236E
- [9] Excellent humidity sensor based on ultrathin HKUST-1 nanosheets? Qiaoe Wang,Meiling Lian,Xiaowen Zhu,Xu ChenRSC Adv., 2021,11, 192-197 10.1039/D0RA08354B
- [10] Fast synthesis of copper nanoclusters through the use of hydrogen peroxide additive and their application for the fluorescence detection of Hg2+ in water samples? Liao Xiaoqing,Li Ruiyi,Li Zaijun,Sun Xiulan,Wang Zhouping,Liu JunkangNew J. Chem., 2015,39, 5240-5248 10.1039/C5NJ00831J
Journal Name:Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry
research_products
-
CAS no.: 89640-58-4