α-Pinene oxide isomerization: role of zeolite structure and acidity in the selective synthesis of campholenic aldehyde?
Catalysis Science & Technology Pub Date: 2018-04-10 DOI: 10.1039/C8CY00371H
Abstract
MWW-type zeolites with different textural properties, namely, MCM-22, MCM-36, MCM-56, and MCM-49, were synthesized and tested in the selective preparation of campholenic aldehyde by isomerization of α-pinene oxide. Commercial zeolites USY, Beta, and ZSM-5 were compared. The physico-chemical properties of the studied zeolites were correlated with their catalytic performance in the isomerization of α-pinene oxide carried out either in toluene as a solvent at 70 °C or in N,N-dimethylacetamide at 140 °C. α-Pinene oxide isomerizes easily in the presence of acids and therefore, high conversions were achieved over commercial as well as synthesized MWW catalysts. Higher selectivities to campholenic aldehyde were achieved over MWW catalysts in basic N,N-dimethylacetamide while non-basic toluene enhanced the formation of the desired aldehyde over all the commercial zeolites. The highest selectivity to the desired aldehyde was achieved over MCM-22 in the reaction performed in N,N-dimethylacetamide at 140 °C, being 83% at total conversion of α-pinene oxide. This is the best result achieved rivaling homogenous acids (ZnBr2) and metal–organic frameworks.
Recommended Literature
- [1] Establishing the accuracy of position-specific carbon isotope analysis of propane by GC-pyrolysis-GC-IRMS ChangjieLiu,PengLiu,XiaofengWang,XiaoqiangLi,JuskeHorita 10.1002/rcm.9494
- [2] Examination of deposit in commercial diluted phosphoric acid Analyst, 1880,5, 146-147 10.1039/AN8800500146
- [3] Excess electrons in lithium–ethylamine solutions—density, electrical conductivity and EPR studies Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 1999,1, 3561-3565 10.1039/A900683D
- [4] Evidence of field induced slow magnetic relaxation in cis-[Co(hfac)2(H2O)2] exhibiting tri-axial anisotropy with a negative axial component? Denis V. Korchagin,Elena A. Yureva,Alexander V. Akimov,Eugenii Ya. Misochko,Gennady V. Shilov,Artem D. Talantsev,Roman B. Morgunov,Alexander A. Shakin,Sergey M. Aldoshin,Boris S. TsukerblatDalton Trans., 2017,46, 7540-7548 10.1039/C7DT01236E
- [5] Evidence of CO2 molecule acting as an electron acceptor on a nanoporous metal–organic-framework MIL-53 or Cr3+(OH)(O2C–C6H4–CO2)? Alexandre Vimont,Arnaud Travert,Philippe Bazin,Jean-Claude Lavalley,Marco Daturi,Christian Serre,Gérard Férey,Sandrine Bourrelly,Philip L. LlewellynChem. Commun., 2007, 3291-3293 10.1039/B703468G
- [6] Distinct correlation between (CN2)x units and pores: a low-cost method for predesigned wide range control of micropore size of porous carbon? Xiaotong Feng,Lei Bian,Jie Ma,Lei Zhou,Xiayan Wang,Guangsheng Guo,Qiaosheng PuChem. Commun., 2019,55, 3963-3966 10.1039/C9CC01213C
- [7] Fe3O4 nanoclusters highly dispersed on a porous graphene support as an additive for improving the hydrogen storage properties of LiBH4? Guang Xu,Wei Zhang,Ying Zhang,Xiaoxia Zhao,Ping Wen,Di MaRSC Adv., 2018,8, 19353-19361 10.1039/C8RA02762E
- [8] Emergence of cationic polyamine dendrimersomes: design, stimuli sensitivity and potential biomedical applications Partha Laskar,Christine DufèsNanoscale Adv., 2021,3, 6007-6026 10.1039/D1NA00536G
- [9] Emulsifier-free, organotellurium-mediated living radical emulsion polymerization (emulsion TERP) of styrene: poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate) macro-TERP agent? Yukiya KitayamaPolym. Chem., 2014,5, 2784-2792 10.1039/C3PY01539D
- [10] Evolution of hierarchical porous structures in supramolecular guest–host hydrogels? Christopher B. Rodell,Christopher B. Highley,Minna H. Chen,Neville N. Dusaj,Chao Wang,Lin Han,Jason A. BurdickSoft Matter, 2016,12, 7839-7847 10.1039/C6SM01395C
Journal Name:Catalysis Science & Technology
research_products
-
CAS no.: 89640-58-4