Virtual hydrate screening and coformer selection for improved relative humidity stability
CrystEngComm Pub Date: 2015-02-05 DOI: 10.1039/C4CE02523G
Abstract
Drug formulations of anhydrous solid forms are generally preferred over hydrated forms. This is due to the risks of low exposure and unacceptable physical and chemical stability in comparison with anhydrous formulations. The purpose of the current study was to determine which descriptors can be most efficiently applied to virtual screening in order to provide answers to the following questions: 1) what is the propensity to form a solid state hydrate of a pharmaceutical compound, and 2) in regards to cocrystalline formulation, which coformer would provide for the highest stability with respect to relative humidity (RH) conditions? A number of properties of different complexity were tested to provide answers to these questions, including COSMO-RS excess free energy Gex and enthalpy Hex of hydration of the compound in amorphous state; octanol–water partition coefficient clogP; polar surface area TPSA; different combinations of molecular H-bond donor and acceptor counts; an excess enthalpy of API (active pharmaceutical ingredient)-coformer mixing; and coformer solubilities. It was demonstrated that the Gex property provides the most efficient way of virtual screening of hydration propensity of solid pharmaceutical compounds. It was also demonstrated that a virtual coformer screening based on the API coformer miscibility, as measured by the COSMO-RS Hex property, may be efficiently used to guide the experimental selection of coformers which have an increased probability of cocrystallization and provide the highest RH stability.
Recommended Literature
- [1] Excimer emission and magnetoluminescence of radical-based zinc(ii) complexes doped in host crystals? Shojiro Kimura,Tetsuro KusamotoChem. Commun., 2020,56, 11195-11198 10.1039/D0CC04830E
- [2] Evidence of CO2 molecule acting as an electron acceptor on a nanoporous metal–organic-framework MIL-53 or Cr3+(OH)(O2C–C6H4–CO2)? Alexandre Vimont,Arnaud Travert,Philippe Bazin,Jean-Claude Lavalley,Marco Daturi,Christian Serre,Gérard Férey,Sandrine Bourrelly,Philip L. LlewellynChem. Commun., 2007, 3291-3293 10.1039/B703468G
- [3] Evolution of dealloying induced strain in nanoporous gold crystals? Ross Harder,David C. Dunand,Ian McNultyNanoscale, 2017,9, 5686-5693 10.1039/C6NR09635B
- [4] Emerging investigators Polym. Chem., 2015,6, 5501-5502 10.1039/C5PY90111A
- [5] Fate of single walled carbon nanotubes in wetland ecosystems? Joseph H. Bisesi,Tara Sabo-AttwoodEnviron. Sci.: Nano, 2014,1, 574-583 10.1039/C4EN00063C
- [6] Excellent electrochemical performance of LiFe0.4Mn0.6PO4 microspheres produced using a double carbon coating process? Yong Ping Huang,Tao Tao,Zheng Chen,Wei Han,Ying Wu,Chunjiang Kuang,Shaoxiong Zhou,Ying ChenJ. Mater. Chem. A, 2014,2, 18831-18837 10.1039/C4TA03994G
- [7] Fe/Fe3C@C nanoparticles encapsulated in N-doped graphene–CNTs framework as an efficient bifunctional oxygen electrocatalyst for robust rechargeable Zn–air batteries? Zhiyan Chen,Nan Wu,Yaobing Wang,Bing Wang,Yingde WangJ. Mater. Chem. A, 2018,6, 516-526 10.1039/C7TA08423D
- [8] Excellent peroxidase mimicking property of CuO/Pt nanocomposites and their application as an ascorbic acid sensor? Xinhuan Wang,Shuangfei Cai,Cui QiAnalyst, 2017,142, 2500-2506 10.1039/C7AN00589J
- [9] Enabling shape memory and healable effects in a conjugated polymer by incorporating siloxane via dynamic imine bond? Yaling Zhang,Chunhui Dai,Shiwei Zhou,Bin LiuChem. Commun., 2018,54, 10092-10095 10.1039/C8CC05410J
- [10] Estimation of activation energy for electroporation and pore growth rate in liquid crystalline and gel phases of lipid bilayers using molecular dynamics simulations? Amit Kumar Majhi,Subbarao Kanchi,V. Venkataraman,K. G. Ayappa,Prabal K. MaitiSoft Matter, 2015,11, 8632-8640 10.1039/C5SM02029H
Journal Name:CrystEngComm
research_products
-
CAS no.: 89640-58-4