Quantitative profile–profile relationship (QPPR) modelling: a novel machine learning approach to predict and associate chemical characteristics of unspent ammunition from gunshot residue (GSR)?
Analyst Pub Date: 2018-11-02 DOI: 10.1039/C8AN01841C
Abstract
Evidence association in forensic cases involving gunshot residue (GSR) remains very challenging. Herein, a new in silico approach, called quantitative profile–profile relationship (QPPR) modelling, is reported. This is based on the application of modern machine learning techniques to predict the pre-discharge chemical profiles of selected ammunition components from those of the respective post-discharge GSR. The obtained profiles can then be compared with one another and/or with other measured profiles to make evidential links during forensic investigations. In particular, the approach was optimised and successfully tested for the prediction of GC-MS profiles of smokeless powders (SLPs) from organic GSR in spent cases, for nine ammunition types. Results showed a high degree of similarity between predicted and experimentally measured profiles, after adequate combination and evaluation of fourteen machine learning techniques (median correlation of 0.982). Areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.976 and 0.824 were observed after receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of the results obtained in the comparisons between predicted–predicted and predicted–measured profiles, respectively, in the specific case that the ammunition types of interest were excluded from the training dataset (i.e., extrapolation). Furthermore, AUCs of 0.962 and 0.894 were observed in interpolation mode. These values were close to those of the comparison of the measured SLP profiles between themselves (AUC = 0.998), demonstrating excellent potential to correctly associate evidence in a number of different forensic scenarios. This work represents the first time that a quantitative approach has successfully been applied to associate a GSR to a specific ammunition.
Recommended Literature
- [1] Fe3O4 nanosphere@microporous organic networks: enhanced anode performances in lithium ion batteries through carbonization? Byungho Lim,Jaewon Jin,Jin Yoo,Seung Yong Han,Kyeongyeol Kim,Sungah Kang,Nojin Park,Sang Moon Lee,Hae Jin Kim,Seung Uk SonChem. Commun., 2014,50, 7723-7726 10.1039/C4CC02068E
- [2] Evidence of rutile-to-anatase photo-induced electron transfer in mixed-phase TiO2 by solid-state NMR spectroscopy? Weili Dai,Guangjun Wu,Michael HungerChem. Commun., 2015,51, 13779-13782 10.1039/C5CC04971G
- [3] Distinct roles of SNARE-mimicking lipopeptides during initial steps of membrane fusion? Alena Koukalová,?árka Pokorná,Aimee L. Boyle,Nestor Lopez Mora,Alexander Kros,Martin Hof,Radek ?achlNanoscale, 2018,10, 19064-19073 10.1039/C8NR05730C
- [4] Emerging investigator series: bacteriophages as nano engineering tools for quality monitoring and pathogen detection in water and wastewater Fereshteh BayatEnviron. Sci.: Nano, 2021,8, 367-389 10.1039/D0EN00962H
- [5] Excellent peroxidase mimicking property of CuO/Pt nanocomposites and their application as an ascorbic acid sensor? Xinhuan Wang,Shuangfei Cai,Cui QiAnalyst, 2017,142, 2500-2506 10.1039/C7AN00589J
- [6] Dissociative electron attachment to HGaF4 Lewis–Br?nsted superacid Marcin Czapla,Jack SimonsPhys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2018,20, 21739-21745 10.1039/C8CP04007A
- [7] EWOD-driven droplet microfluidic device integrated with optoelectronic tweezers as an automated platform for cellular isolation and analysis? Gaurav J. Shah,Eric P.-Y. Chiou,Ming C. Wu,Chang-Jin “CJ” KimLab Chip, 2009,9, 1732-1739 10.1039/B821508A
- [8] Emerging investigator series: first-principles and thermodynamics comparison of compositionally-tuned delafossites: cation release from the (001) surface of complex metal oxides? Joseph W. Bennett,Diamond T. Jones,Blake G. Hudson,Joshua Melendez-Rivera,Robert J. Hamers,Sara E. MasonEnviron. Sci.: Nano, 2020,7, 1642-1651 10.1039/C9EN01304K
- [9] Fe3O4 nanoclusters highly dispersed on a porous graphene support as an additive for improving the hydrogen storage properties of LiBH4? Guang Xu,Wei Zhang,Ying Zhang,Xiaoxia Zhao,Ping Wen,Di MaRSC Adv., 2018,8, 19353-19361 10.1039/C8RA02762E
- [10] Fe(ii)-Assisted one-pot synthesis of ultra-small core–shell Au–Pt nanoparticles as superior catalysts towards the HER and ORR? Yi Cao,Yujiao Xiahou,Lixiang Xing,Xiang Zhang,Hong Li,ChenShou Wu,Haibing XiaNanoscale, 2020,12, 20456-20466 10.1039/D0NR04995F
Journal Name:Analyst
research_products
-
CAS no.: 89640-58-4